FROM STREETS TO SCREENS: YOUTH SLANG AS A DRIVER OF LANGUAGE CHANGE IN THE DIGITAL ERA

FROM STREETS TO SCREENS: YOUTH SLANG AS A DRIVER OF LANGUAGE CHANGE IN THE DIGITAL ERA

Authors

  • Ozodaxon Karimova Teacher of World languages department, Kokand University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v17i.1373

Keywords:

digital communication, sociolinguistic innovation, identity construction, online discourse, non-standard language, multimodality, social media language.

Abstract

This article examines youth slang as a dynamic force driving language change in the digital era, focusing on the transition of informal expressions from street-based interaction to online communication platforms. With the rapid expansion of social media, messaging applications, and digital communities, youth slang has gained unprecedented visibility and influence, accelerating processes of lexical innovation, semantic shift, and pragmatic change. Drawing on sociolinguistic and discourse-analytic perspectives, the study explores how young speakers creatively manipulate language to construct social identity, signal group membership, and negotiate meaning in digital spaces. Particular attention is paid to the role of multimodality, including emojis, abbreviations, and hybrid language forms, in reshaping contemporary slang usage. The article also discusses how digitally mediated youth slang contributes to the diffusion of non-standard forms into mainstream language, challenging traditional norms of correctness and standardization. By analyzing authentic examples from online discourse, the study highlights the interaction between technological affordances and linguistic creativity. The findings suggest that youth slang functions not only as a marker of generational identity but also as a significant catalyst for ongoing language change, reflecting broader social, cultural, and technological transformations in modern communication.

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar:

1. Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change, Volume 2: Social factors. Blackwell.

2. Karimova, O. (2024). Linguopragmatic study of phraseological units with a somatic component in english and uzbek languages. Actual Problems of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(9), 327-338.

3. Mamatqulova Marhabo. (2020). DEVELOPMENT OF THE CATEGORY OF MODALITY IN PHILOLOGY AND THEIR COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS. CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 3(01), 40–45. https://doi.org/10.37547/philological-crjps-03-01-08

4. Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change: Key concepts, research traditions, open issues. Sociolinguistic Studies, 8(2), 259–293. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v8i2.259

5. Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.

6. qizi Karimova, O. A. (2025, July). Linguistic, Cultural, and Pragmatic Challenges in Translating Idiomatic Expressions from English to Uzbek. In International Conference on Global Trends and Innovations in Multidisciplinary Research (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 34-36).

7. Tagliamonte, S. A. (2016). Teen talk: The language of adolescents. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139514769

8. Karimova, O. (2025). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF POETIC DEVICES: ALLITERATION, ASSONANCE, AND ENJAMBMENT IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK POETRY. QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI, 14, 192–194. https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v14i.1161

9. Marhaboxon, M. (2025). “Intercultural Communication and Linguo-Cultural Specificity in Film Texts: Uzbek and Western Cinematography”. Advances in Science and Education, 1(5), 16-18. https://doi.org/10.70728/edu.v01.i05.006

10. García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan

11. Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice: The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Blackwell.

12. Tagliamonte, S. A., & Denis, D. (2008). Linguistic ruin? LOL! Instant messaging and teen language. American Speech, 83(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2008-001

13. Eble, C. (2012). Slang and sociability: In-group language among college students (2nd ed.). University of North Carolina Press.

14. Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407

15. Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

16. Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913489198

Published

2026-01-15

Iqtiboslik olish

Karimova , O. (2026). FROM STREETS TO SCREENS: YOUTH SLANG AS A DRIVER OF LANGUAGE CHANGE IN THE DIGITAL ERA. QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI, 17, 117–120. https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v17i.1373
Loading...