THE DEVELOPMENT OF PHONEME PARADIGMS OF LINGUISTIC SIGN GRADATION IN VARIOUS LANGUAGE SYSTEMS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v17i.1372Keywords:
ablaut, consonant gradation, reduplication, typology, paradigmsAbstract
Phoneme paradigms of linguistic sign gradation—systematic alternations of phonemes within lexemes signaling morphological, semantic, or prosodic contrasts—appear across diverse, often unrelated language families. This article examines how such paradigms develop, compares major types of gradation (vowel ablaut, consonant gradation, templatic alternation, reduplication, and tonal/ prosodic alternation), and synthesizes mechanisms that underlie their emergence and maintenance: phonetic/phonological conditioning, morphologization and grammaticalization, analogical leveling, prosodic reanalysis, and contact-induced diffusion. Representative case studies from Indo-European, Finnic, Semitic, Austronesian, and Bantu languages illustrate convergent developmental paths and typological variation. The article concludes with methodological recommendations for future research and discusses theoretical and applied implications for typology, acquisition, and computational modeling.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar:
1) Blevins, J. (2004). Evolutionary phonology: The emergence of sound patterns. Oxford University Press.
2) Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge University Press.
3) Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press.
4) Croft, W. (2003). Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
5) Fortson, B. V. (2010). Indo European language and culture: An introduction (2nd ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
6) Hock, H. H., & Joseph, B. D. (1996). Language history, language change, and language relationship: An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics (2nd ed.). Mouton de Gruyter.
7) Hay, J., & Baayen, R. H. (2005). Shifting paradigms: Gradient productivity and cumulative frequency in morphological processes. In G. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004 (pp. 81–101). Springer.
8) Karlsson, F. (1999). Finnish: An essential grammar. Routledge.
9) McCarthy, J. J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry, 12(3), 373–418.
10) McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. S. (1990). Prosodic morphology I: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. University of Massachusetts, GLSA Publications/Technical Report.
11) Thomason, S. G., & Kaufman, T. (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. University of California Press.
Downloads
Published
Iqtiboslik olish
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.