INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS AND RISKS IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY: WAYS TO REDUCE UNCERTAINTY FOR ECONOMIC AGENTS

INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS AND RISKS IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY: WAYS TO REDUCE UNCERTAINTY FOR ECONOMIC AGENTS

Authors

  • Kurpayanidi Konstantin Ivanovich PhD in economics, Professor, International Institute of Food Technology and Engineering, Professor of the Department of Economics, Fergana polytechnic institute, Academician of the International Academy of Theoretical and Applied Sciences (USA), Ferghana, Republic of Uzbekistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v9i9.827

Keywords:

information asymmetry, electronic platform for digital portfolios, institutional traps, quality of information flows, rationality in the digital economy, digital economy.

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving landscape of the modern world, the inexorable shift towards a digital revolution is reshaping traditional economic models across the globe, including the Republic of Uzbekistan. This article delves into the impediments posed by institutional constraints in the digital economy, elucidating how legal frameworks governing digital interactions and inefficient institutional arrangements can impede the development and optimization of digital business models. Notably, the absence of clear regulations on electronic payments, cybersecurity, and data protection can introduce unpredictability, jeopardizing security and trust within the digital environment. The abundance of data and information, coupled with unequal distribution among market participants, may lead to suboptimal decision-making, inefficient resource utilization, and disparities in access to digital opportunities. The article aims to analyze and propose strategies to overcome institutional limitations and information asymmetry, emphasizing the need for effective institutional structures and mechanisms. In conclusion, this article provides a comprehensive examination of the challenges and opportunities in optimizing the digital economy in Uzbekistan. By proposing strategies to address institutional constraints and information asymmetry, it offers a roadmap for fostering a thriving digital ecosystem that benefits all stakeholders in the Republic of Uzbekistan.

Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar:

Kurpayanidi, K. I. (2023). Analysing the functioning of enterprise management in the context of institutional reforms. Yashil iqtisodiyot va taraqqiyot. Vol. 10. 581-586. URL: https://yashil-iqtisodiyot-taraqqiyot.uz/journal/index.php/GED/article/view/111/107

Kurpayanidi К. (2023). Raqamli iqtisodiyot sharoitidа axborot kamchiliklari va institutsional cheklovlarni bartaraf etish. Iqtisodiyot va taʼlim, 24(5), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.55439/ECED/vol24_iss5/%x

Avdokushin, E. F., & Kuznetsova, E. G. (2022). The sharing model as a determining factor in the functioning of a modern business. Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic Sciences, (2 (24)), 201-211. In Russian

Toffler, A. (2022). Powershift: Knowledge, wealth, and power at the edge of the 21st century. Bantam.

Zuev, A. G., & Myasnikova, L. A. (2003). The digital revolution is ahead. Free Thought, (5), 55-63. In Russian.

Gruzdeva, M.A. (2022). The age factor of the digital divide: the edges of inequality. Economic and social changes: facts, trends, forecast, 15 (4), 228-241. In Russian.

Garipova, G. R. (2015). The information picture of the world as a socio-cultural phenomenon. Humanities, Socio-economic and Social Sciences, (5), 20-23. In Russian.

Pang, J., Zhang, Y., & Jiao, F. (2023). The Impact of the Digital Economy on Transformation and Upgrading of Industrial Structure: A Perspective Based on the “Poverty Trap”. Sustainability, 15(20), 15125.

Sun, Y. Y., & Higham, J. (2021). Overcoming information asymmetry in tourism carbon management: The application of a new reporting architecture to Aotearoa New Zealand. Tourism Management, 83, 104231.

Sologub, V. A., & Khasheva, I. A. (2021). Current trends in the development of the processes of digitalization of public administration. In Digitalization of public administration, economics, politics and the social sphere: problems and prospects (pp. 53-61). In Russian.

Zozulya, D. M. (2018). Digitalization of the Russian economy and Industry 4.0: challenges and prospects. Issues of the innovative economy, 8(1), 1-14. In Russian.

Greengard, S. (2016). The Internet of Things: The future is already here. Alpina Publisher.

Zolaev, E.A. (2022). Economic security of the state: the concept and threats of digitalization. Economic Security, 5(2), 571-582.

Machlup, F. (2014). Knowledge: Its creation, distribution and economic significance, Volume III: The economics of information and human capital (Vol. 781). Princeton university press.

Cao, H., Jiang, J., Oh, L. B., Li, H., Liao, X., & Chen, Z. (2013). A Maslow's hierarchy of needs analysis of social networking services continuance. Journal of Service Management, 24(2), 170-190.

Mládková, L. (2012). Leadership in management of knowledge workers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 243-250.

Rakhmani, I., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2024). The Cultural Political Economy of Knowledge in Neo-Liberal Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 1-17.

Salvadorinho, J., & Teixeira, L. (2021). Organizational knowledge in the I4. 0 using BPMN: a case study. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 981-988.

Zhang, A. X., Muller, M., & Wang, D. (2020). How do data science workers collaborate? roles, workflows, and tools. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW1), 1-23.

Forsman, K., & Horned, A. (2019). Since the beginning of this interview i have managed four emails: A qualitative study of email management for information workers.

Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S., Suri, S., Sinha, S., Weston, J., ... & Teevan, J. (2022). The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature human behaviour, 6(1), 43-54.

Stiglitz, J. E. & Korinek, A., (2021). Artificial intelligence, globalization, and strategies for economic development (No. w28453). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). The structure of labor markets and shadow prices in LDCs. In Migration and the labor market in developing countries (pp. 13-63). Routledge.

Sigler, J. T. (2022). Three Essays on Strategic Factor Markets and RBV Paradoxes (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).

Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American economic review, 70(3), 393-408.

Ismoilzhonov, V. & others (2023). The development of the digital economy and its relationship with the growth of regional competitiveness. Nashrlar, 1(2), 293–295. Retrieved from https://e-itt.uz/index.php/editions/article/view/424

Published

2023-12-30

Iqtiboslik olish

Kurpayanidi Konstantin Ivanovich. (2023). INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS AND RISKS IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY: WAYS TO REDUCE UNCERTAINTY FOR ECONOMIC AGENTS. QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI, 9(9), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v9i9.827

Issue

Section

Iqtisodiyot / Economy
Loading...