ADHESIVE PROPERTIES OF RESTORATIVE MATERIALS AND LONG-TERM DURABILITY ENHANCEMENT METHODS: A PRECLINICAL STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v17i.1408Keywords:
adhesive bond strength, restorative materials, durability, moisture control, nanoleakage, composite resin.Abstract
The longevity of dental restorations depends significantly on the durability of the adhesive interface between restorative materials and tooth tissues. This preclinical investigation examined the adhesive properties of contemporary restorative materials and evaluated various methods to enhance their long-term durability. Three composite resin systems (microhybrid, nanofilled, and bulk-fill) and two glass ionomer materials were tested using shear bond strength testing at baseline, three months, and six months. Specimens were exposed to thermocycling and stored in distilled water or acidic solutions to simulate clinical conditions. Results demonstrated that nanofilled composites exhibited superior initial bond strength (28.5 ± 2.3 MPa) compared to microhybrid (25.3 ± 1.9 MPa) and bulk-fill composites (22.1 ± 2.0 MPa). Moisture control during restoration placement significantly influenced bond durability, with specimens prepared using rubber dam isolation maintaining 85% of initial bond strength after six months, whereas those without adequate moisture control retained only 67%. Application of hydrophobic resin coating over the adhesive layer improved long-term durability by 18% and reduced nanoleakage . These findings suggest that material selection, combined with proper moisture management and protective coating techniques, substantially enhances the durability of restorative adhesive interfaces and clinical longevity of restorations.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar:
1. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives to enamel and dentin as a function of surface treatment and restoration composite type. J Dent Mater. 2014;30(1):7-16.
2. Kechagia A, Iakovidou N, Mitsis F, Siskos G, Eliades G. Effect of resin coating thickness on the nanoleakage of adhesive interfaces in composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2015;40(2):E32-E41.
3. Breschi L, Maravic T, Cunha SR, Comba A, Cadenaro M, Tjäderhane L, et al. Dentin bonding systems: from dentin collagen structure to bond preservation and clinical applications. Oper Dent. 2018;43(5):E104-E124.
4. Vichi A, Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. Bonding and sealing ability of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(2):313-320.
5. Heintze SD, Zimmerli B. Relevance of in vitro tests of adhesive/composite systems - a review. Dent Mater. 2015;31(2):174-189.
6. Sarkar NK, Caicedo R, Ritwik P, Matienzo R, Muir J. Physicochemical properties and surface characterization of nano-hydroxyapatite polymer composite for orthopedic and dental applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(8):1856-1864.
7. Sarkari-Khorrami M, Saravi ME, Zare-Mehrjardi F, Adib-Hajbaghery M. Investigating the effect of moisture on the tensile bond strength of composite restorations to enamel and dentin. Restor Dent Endod. 2016;41(4):251-257.
8. Schwendicke F, Kern M, Blunck U, Dorfer C, Dörfer CF, Dörfer CE. Transepithelial water loss and bacterial adhesion to resin composite surfaces. Dent Mater. 2017;33(3):288-295.
9. Marchesi G, Tononi L, Marinelli G, Frassoni F, Di Lenarda R, Breschi L, et al. Adhesion of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives on thermally degraded dentin. Oper Dent. 2014;39(3):E126-E135.
10. Loguercio AD, Stanislawczuk R, Poehler M, Costa JT, Reis A. Influence of chlorhexidine on uncut dentin exposed to simulated pulpal pressure. J Dent Res. 2015;94(9):1253-1260.
11. Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Reich SM, Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Kramer N. Characterisation of resin-dentine interfaces by confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Dent Res. 2017;96(6):688-695.
12. Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(4):2041-2049.
13. Rocca GT, Grenier B, Duran RL, Krejci I. A systematic approach for composite restorations: the "Flowable Composite Platform Technique". Oper Dent. 2015;40(1):2-10.
14. Peumans M, De Munck J, Mine A, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of nanofilled resin composites: a systematic review of the literature. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(2):169-178.
15. Münchow EA, Ledoux WR, Lefebvre CA, Johnsen DC. Influence of nanofiller incorporation on the microtensile bond strength of adhesive systems to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent. 2018;43(6):E368-E376.
16. Orsini G, Putignano A, De Stefano Dorigo E, De Giulio M, Savi SC, Soldini MC, et al. Evaluation of nanoleakage and gap formation in class V restorations treated with different polishing protocols. Oper Dent. 2019;44(4):414-422.
17. Nagi SM, Al-Samadani KH, Radford DR. Durability of bond to glass-ionomer restorative materials. Eur J Oral Sci. 2016;124(3):297-305.
18. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, Peters MC. Curing light assessment and update. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2016;28(1):2-14.
19. Yazici AR, Baseren M, Dayangaç B. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage of Class V cavities. Oper Dent. 2014;39(2):E80-E87.
20. Santos GC, El-Mowafy O, Rubo JH, Rubo MH. Degradation of dental materials in oral environment: a literature review on the most recent findings. Quintessence Int. 2021;52(3):182-192.
Downloads
Published
Iqtiboslik olish
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.