THE PRAGMATIC ROLE OF PAREMIAS IN EXPRESSING SOCIAL NORMS IN UZBEK AND ENGLISH DISCOURSES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v17i.1387Keywords:
Paremias, pragmatics, social norms, Uzbek and English discourse, evaluative language, cultural values, proverbs, discourse analysisAbstract
Paremias, as culturally embedded linguistic units, play a significant pragmatic role in expressing and regulating social norms within discourse. This study investigates how paremias function as pragmatic tools for articulating socially accepted values and behavioral expectations in Uzbek and English discourses. Adopting a discourse-pragmatic and contrastive approach, the research examines the illocutionary force, evaluative orientation, and contextual dependency of paremias as they are employed to convey normative meanings. The analysis reveals that in both Uzbek and English discourses, paremias are frequently used as indirect speech acts to legitimize social norms, mitigate face-threatening acts, and guide interpersonal behavior. However, notable cross-cultural differences emerge in the pragmatic realization of these functions. Uzbek paremias predominantly emphasize collectivist values, respect for social hierarchy, and moral responsibility, while English paremias tend to foreground individual autonomy, practical wisdom, and self-regulation. The findings demonstrate that paremias serve not merely as rhetorical devices but as dynamic pragmatic mechanisms through which social norms are enacted, reinforced, and negotiated in discourse.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar:
1. Qodirova, Z. (2025). Linguocultural Features of Proverbs in Abdulla Qahhor’s and O. Henry’s Works. TLEP – International Journal of Multidiscipline, 2(5), 10-17. https://www.tlepub.org/index.php/1/article/view/296
2. Rashidova Manzura Baxtiyorovna. THE CONCEPT OF DISCOURSE IN MODERN LINGUISTICS // ResearchJet Journal of Analyisis and Inventions // Volume 2, Issue 7 July, 2021.- p 7.
3. qizi Qodirova, Z. H. (2024). THE LINGUISTIC PECULARITIES OF PAREMIOLOGY IN LITERARY TEXTS. Journal of Modern Educational Achievements, 3(1), 6-9.
4. Khayrulla Toshquvvatov, & Alisher Fayziyev. (2024). COGNITIVE AND PRAGMATIC FEATURES OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK PAREMIAS. European International Journal of Philological Sciences, 4(05), 31–35. Retrieved from https://inlibrary.uz/index.php/eijps/article/view/34096
5. Djamila BEGJANOVA. (2025). STRUCTURAL AND SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF PAREMIOLOGICAL UNITS OF UZBEK, KARAKALPAK, AND ENGLISH LANGUAGES . «ACTA NUUz», 1(1.7), 216–218. https
6. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words (pp. 1–167). Oxford University Press.
7. Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics (pp. 1–138). Oxford University Press.
8. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (pp. 1–345). Cambridge University Press.
9. Mieder, W. (2004). Proverbs: A handbook (pp. 1–305). Greenwood Press.
10. Abdulla Qahhor. О‘gʻri. – Toshkent, Gʻafur Gʻulom nomidagi nashriyot. – 2019. B. 6, 7.
Downloads
Published
Iqtiboslik olish
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.