THE COMPARATIVE RESEARCH ON CONJUNCTIONS OF COMPARISON OF ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v14i.1169Keywords:
conjunctions, coordinating, subordinating, correlative, languages, words, part of speech, explanation, comparisonAbstract
English and Uzbek are two distinct languages that use different conjunctions to join words and clauses together. In English, conjunctions are used to join words and clauses together in order to create compound sentences. Common English conjunctions include “and,” “but,” “or,” “so,” “if,” “because,” and “although.” In Uzbek, conjunctions are used to link words, phrases, and clauses together to create compound sentences. Common Uzbek conjunctions include “agar,” “ki,” “ammo,” “ya’ni,” “shunda,” “balo,” and “garchi.” One major difference between English and Uzbek is the difference in conjunctive frequency. In English, the conjunctions “and” and “but” are the two most commonly used conjunctions, often appearing in nearly every sentence. In Uzbek, the conjunctions “agar” and “ki” are the two most frequently used conjunctions, appearing often in spoken and written Uzbek. Another notable difference between English and Uzbek is the way in which the two languages use conjunctions for emphasis. In English, the conjunction “but” is often used to draw attention to a contrast between two clauses or phrases. In Uzbek, the conjunction “ammo” is most commonly used for emphasis. In this article variety of conjunctions will be observed, compared and analyzed below.
Foydalanilgan adabiyotlar:
Aarts, Bars. English Syntax and Argumentation. 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave, 2001. Print.
Aidinlou, Nader Assadi and Reshadi, Elnaz. “A Comparative Study of the Use of Conjunctions and References in Electronic Mails vs. Paper-based Letters” in Journal of Language Teaching and Research. Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 611-615, 2014. Print.
Arthur, Tom Mc. The Oxford Companion to the English Language (Cambridge Edition). Oxford University Press. 1996. Print.
Baskervill, W. M. and Sewell, J. W. “An English Grammar”. 1896. http://classiclit.about.com/library accessed on 1st August, 2015.
Blackemore, Diane and Carston, Robyn. The Pragmatics of and-conjunction: The non- narrative Cases
Burton- Roberts, Noel. Analysing Sentences: An Introduction to English Syntax, 3rdEdition. London: Pearson Education Limited, 2011. Print
Carnie, Andrew. Syntax: A Generative Introduction, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 2007. Print
Crystal, David. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 6th ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2008. Print.
Eckhard-Black, Christine. Cassel Language Guides (German): A Handbook of Grammar, Current Usage and Words, British Library Cataloguing-in-publication Data. 1992. Print.
Haliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, Ruqaiya. Cohesion in English. Longman Group Limited. 1976. Print
Hertwig, Ralph, Benz, Björn and Krauss, Stefan. The Conjunction Fallacy and the many Meanings of and. ELSEVIER. 2008. Print
Huddleston, Rodney. English Grammar: An Outline. Cambridge University Press. 1988. Print
Kirkpatrick, Betty. Better English. Polskabook. 2007. Print
Leech, Geoffrey and Svartvik, Jan. A Communicative Grammar of English 3rd Edition.London: Longman. 1994. Print
Lester, Mark. Grammar in the Classroom. Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. 1990. Print.
Leung, Carrie. A Comparison of the Use of Major English Conjunctions by American and Hong Kong University Students. LUNDS Universitet. 2005. Print.
Lyons, John. Semantics. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. 1977. Print
Hamroyev M., Muhammedova D., Shodmonqulova D., Gulomova X., Yo’ldosheva Sh. Ona tili. 2007. Toshkent: “Iqtisod-Moliya”.
Published
Iqtiboslik olish
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.