HUNARMANDCHILIK DISKURSIDA MADANIY-MILLIY KONSEPTLARNING INGLIZ VA O‘ZBEK TILLARIDAGI LISONIY IFODASI
- Authors
-
-
Ahrorjon Abdusamatov
Qo‘qon davlat universiteti tayanch doktoranti.
-
- Keywords:
- Array
- Abstract
-
Mazkur maqolada hunarmandchilik diskursida madaniy-milliy konseptlarning ingliz va o‘zbek tillaridagi lisoniy ifodasi qiyosiy-kontrastiv nuqtayi nazardan tadqiq etiladi. Tadqiqotning maqsadi hunarmandchilik diskursida markaziy o‘rin tutuvchi madaniy-milliy konseptlarni aniqlash, ularning til vositalari orqali qanday ifodalanishini tahlil qilish hamda bu konseptlarning ingliz va o‘zbek tillaridagi saqlanish darajasini yoritishdan iborat. Metodologik asos sifatida lingvokulturologiya, konseptual tahlil va qiyosiy-kontrastiv tilshunoslik tamoyillariga tayanildi. Tadqiqot natijalari shuni ko‘rsatadiki, hunarmandchilik diskursida “mehnat”, “usta”, “kasb”, “mahorat”, “an’ana”, “baraka”, “halollik” kabi markaziy konseptlar faoliyat yuritadi. Sof kasbiy-texnik mazmunga ega konseptlar ingliz tilida deyarli to‘liq izomorf tarzda saqlansa, diniy-axloqiy va ijtimoiy-ierarxik yuklamaga ega konseptlar tarjimada qisman allomorf o‘zgarishga uchraydi.
- References
-
1. Wierzbicka, A. (1997). Understanding Cultures Through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese. Oxford University Press.
2. Kodura, M. (2025). Conceptualising craft: A contrastive analysis of English and Polish knitting and crocheting terminology. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 19(4), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.24.008.21498
3. Nuraliyev, I. (2024). Problems of translating craft-related realia in English and Uzbek. Xorijiy lingvistika va lingvodidaktika, 2(3), 204–211. https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-3701-vol2-iss3/S-pp204-211
4. Abdisamatov, A. (2025). Linguopragmatic research of craft discourse. Texas Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 5(6), 2157–2160. https://zienjournals.com
5. Aljanova, N. (2025). Roots of Heritage: Honoring Hunarmandchilik Tradition in Uzbekistan – 17 Narratives of Craft Entrepreneurs on Preserving the Traditions. NURCE.
6. Alimova, R., & Karimov, N. (2024). The historical significance of Bukhara as a center of Islamic civilization in Uzbekistan. Science and Technology Publications, 1(7), 917–923.
7. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
8. Mahmudov, N. M. (1984). O‘zbek tilida gapning semantik-sintaktik asimmetriyasi. O‘qituvchi.
9. Safarov, Sh. (2008). Pragmalingvistika. O‘zbekiston Milliy Ensiklopediyasi.
10. Shamsiddinova, M. H. (2025). O‘zbek tilida nutqiy aktlar nazariyasining konseptual asoslarini takomillashtirish usullari. The Multidisciplinary Journal of Science and Technology, 5(6), 2157–2160.
11. Turapova, M. (2026). Contrastive analysis of politeness strategies in English and Uzbek. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/records/18378662
12. Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press.
13. Kecskes, I. (2022). The theoretical framework of intercultural pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108884303.004
14. Ter-Minasova, S. G. (2000). Yazik i mezhkulturnaya kommunikatsiya. Slovo.
15. Karasik, V. I. (2002). Yazikovoy krug: lichnost, kontsepti, diskurs. Gnozis.
- Downloads
- Published
- 2026-10-05
- Section
- Maqolalar
- License
-
Copyright (c) 2026 QO‘QON UNIVERSITETI XABARNOMASI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
